Although the right to transfer all economic property rights has been recognized within the Anglo-American and continental legal order, it should be noted that it is subject to certain qualifications and, in some cases, to certain specific rules in relation to the general contractual rules governing the portability of those rights. The transfer may be made on the basis of various underlying agreements. It may also occur because the assignee and the assignee are parties to a contract under which the assignee is required, given the assignee`s commitment to pay a price, to transfer a right to the assignee as a purchaser of that right. This appears to be the main situation that the authors of the Civil Code had in mind when they drafted the transfer provisions.  In some legal systems, the conflicting rules of traditional laws for transfer functions have been rejected and the law of the place which has the main contacts with the transfer applies. In Downs v. American Courage. Liability Ins. Co., 14 N.Y.2d 266 (N.Y. 1964), a woman and her husband separated and the wife obtained a judgment on her husband`s separation in New York.
The verdict required the husband to pay the wife a certain annual sum. The husband entrusted the woman with 50 per cent of her future salary, wages and wages. The agreement empowered the employer to make such payments to the woman. The effect of a valid assignment is to remove the privilege between the enzessionor and the debtor and to create a lien between the debtor and the agent. Privity is generally defined as a direct and direct contractual relationship. See Merchant`s case above. Under English law, the effect on the original contract may be that of discharge, but unless there is an express contrary provision, any innovation serves as a release between the original parties.  Under U.S. law, it was decided that the question of whether an agreement is a novelty is a matter of intent and that the essential element of innovation is the easing of one of the contracting parties and the acceptance by the other party of a new exercise in place of the other party.  Legal systems around the world recognize and protect on a large scale the inviability of the treaty and the power of a party to transfer or transfer rights, obligations and even the treaty as a whole. One of the justifications for the recognition of the right of contractual transfer is that, in an economy based on money and credit, contract rights must be freely transferable.
Therefore, in the same way that an owner can transfer or transmit his chatl, the creditor should be able to transfer, transfer or cede his intangible rights, with the effect that the purchaser replaces him.  These rights include all rights of economic value, rights to money, mainly rights to money (debts), but also other rights of economic value, such as the right to transfer property and the right to work done.  Under English law, the common law rule is that “the assignee is in the assignee`s shoes” or that the assignee “shares” is subject to the rule that the assignee is subject to shares, always applies to a fair assignment and is kept in action in the event of a definitive assignment of debts and other elected officials.  Equity generally does not intervene to prevent the increase in defence measures that were put in place prior to notification; based on the fact that at that time the shares were identical.  Professor Goode proposed that this rule was developed by the courts to protect the debtor from the injustice that might result from attribution In continental legal systems, German and French laws seem to take a different approach to dismissal.